An Analysis of the Kashmir Dispute
Anwar, Insha (2024)
Anwar, Insha
2024
All rights reserved. This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024041517707
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024041517707
Tiivistelmä
Aim: The present study analyses the Kashmir dispute, commonly perceived as a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan, overlooking the Kashmiris as key stakeholders. The study aimed at finding solutions from the perspective of the people of Kashmir.
Method: Two conflict analysis tools were applied; the Conflict Wheel and INMEDIO’s Conflict Perspective Analysis (CPA).
Results: India and Pakistan utilize the Kashmir dispute for their interests, neglecting the Kashmiri people's concerns, leading to their alienation. To keep regional supremacy, the U.S. and its allies are strengthening economic relations with India, positioning it as a competitor to China. Subsequently, it has damaged Pakistan’s standing in the Kashmir dispute, leaning the balance of power in favour of India. In addition, India and Pakistan becoming nuclear powers have amplified the threat of an atomic war in the region. This highlights the urgency to resolve the Kashmir dispute and foster peace in the region.
Conclusions: Global powers have not effectively pressured India to reverse its recent abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A. Urgent resolution of the Kashmir dispute is vital to avoid potential war between nuclear-armed rivals. Destabilisation of both Pakistan and India would not only affect the region but also carry global ramifications.
Method: Two conflict analysis tools were applied; the Conflict Wheel and INMEDIO’s Conflict Perspective Analysis (CPA).
Results: India and Pakistan utilize the Kashmir dispute for their interests, neglecting the Kashmiri people's concerns, leading to their alienation. To keep regional supremacy, the U.S. and its allies are strengthening economic relations with India, positioning it as a competitor to China. Subsequently, it has damaged Pakistan’s standing in the Kashmir dispute, leaning the balance of power in favour of India. In addition, India and Pakistan becoming nuclear powers have amplified the threat of an atomic war in the region. This highlights the urgency to resolve the Kashmir dispute and foster peace in the region.
Conclusions: Global powers have not effectively pressured India to reverse its recent abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A. Urgent resolution of the Kashmir dispute is vital to avoid potential war between nuclear-armed rivals. Destabilisation of both Pakistan and India would not only affect the region but also carry global ramifications.
Kokoelmat
- 515 Psykologia [263]